pleco for malawi tank

scatz

Retired Staff
Apr 8, 2009
5,379
2
38
47
Devon, UK
I personally have seen no examples of this and believe everyone to be concerned about the fish only.
"Ok well i am going to set up a malawi/flash plec set up. i think it will be awesome anyone think this isnt a good idea?"

this is an example of baiting.

i'm not questioning everyones concern for their fish, i'm merely stating that baiting and personal attacks are against the site rules and will do nothing but get this thread closed, and again, keep the thread relevant
 

JoePlec

Member
Aug 27, 2010
786
0
16
Rainhill, Merseyside
Sadly this is not true
From a biological point all organisms’ must reproduce for one reason to enable the organisms to dominate the planet.
A tree will Bloom (Reproduce) when attacked (Pruned)
Organisms’ reproduce at the two extremes’ under threat to keep the species alive or optimum conditions i.e. to keep the species main aim alive (World Domination)
And the statement about women is sadly not funny or true
So explain to me why a L128 has lived 5 years in a malawi tank? you cannot just say its not true when im providing you information of it being true.

And the statement about women was not meant to be funny and i forgot to add IMO :whistle
 

JoePlec

Member
Aug 27, 2010
786
0
16
Rainhill, Merseyside
"Ok well i am going to set up a malawi/flash plec set up. i think it will be awesome anyone think this isnt a good idea?"

this is an example of baiting.

i'm not questioning everyones concern for their fish, i'm merely stating that baiting and personal attacks are against the site rules and will do nothing but get this thread closed, and again, keep the thread relevant
I am not baiting whatsoever i know have plans for that setup based on the ph that L204 can live in which i wasnt aware of.
 

JoePlec

Member
Aug 27, 2010
786
0
16
Rainhill, Merseyside
Ok this will be my last post on this thread because its obviously starting to annoy people.

I know fish can adapt to different surroundings, some more than others granted, but thousands of people who keep bristlenose in malawi setups cant be wrong.
As for the L128 5 years and still going strong. Compare that to the average idiot who goes into a LFS and pays £50 for a 3inch L128 and goes home and kills it within 2 weeks. So who is wrong? (by the way that question does not need an answer, because i wont be replying to it)


Cheers
Joe
 

macvsog23

Pleco Profiles Team - RIP FRIEND
May 1, 2009
2,671
0
36
71
Bristol
i'll take that bet Bob, because if the thread carries on the way its going, i will be closing it.
As per the site rules that you all agreed with, argue with the post, not the person, alot of the posts are getting too personal. Some are even baiting members into an arguement, if this continues, infractions will be issued too.

Remember that everyone is entitled to an opinion and we should respect that and not challenge it, i'm all up for a healthy debate, but not when it turns into a ***** fight, so keep it civil and keep it relevant
The main point of the post was to ask could any one recommend a Pleco to keep in a Malawi tank.

My reply was based on my understanding of fish biology and several years of fish keeping.
Reply’s to the disagreeing with me were mainly based on the presumption of it can be done or it is not proven that the fish suffers.
Several members gave quite detailed reason why it is not a good idea from the point of the fish in fact I have gained quite a bit of knowledge from several of these posts.
Admittedly some people found my comment that it is morally wrong offensive or hard to swallow.
My comment is based purely on two things my love of fish and the LAW I quote the relevant act of parliament several times
I also note of the over 18,000 prosecutions related to this act under 1% are related to fish showing for me one of two things fish keepers and sellers are a top on bunch and never subject fish to miss treatment or they are lucky that people don’t see fish in the same light as they do doggy woggys bunny wunntys and pussy wussys.
But back to the subject, I suspect that the main reason for keeping a pleco in a Malawi tank is one of again two reasons to control algae or to have some thing colourful in the tank.
Both reasons are ones I would never use a fish for.

on balance the argument for not keeping a pleco in a Malawi tank seems to have for me sound reasoning so I stick by my opinion and have found nothing to change it in fact posts on this matter have made me understand more why its wrong
Before it was just a gut reaction to mixing fish
Well I hope it goes on for over 10 pages because every time I read it I find more information.
 

dw1305

Global Moderators
Staff member
May 5, 2009
1,396
0
36
Wiltshire nr. Bath, UK
Hi all,
I'll remember what Scatz said, so this really will be my last post on this thread. JoePlec wrote:
So are we saying a fish cannot adapt to live in these conditions?....
That is exactly what we are saying, an individual fish doesn't, & can't, adapt outside of very limited parameters.

All living organisms have a range of conditions in which they can survive. I'll use humans and altitude/oxygen content as my example, as it is an example that every-one can relate to. [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altitude_sickness"]Altitude sickness - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Altitude_sickness_warning.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/52/Altitude_sickness_warning.jpg/275px-Altitude_sickness_warning.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/5/52/Altitude_sickness_warning.jpg/275px-Altitude_sickness_warning.jpg[/ame] For most people they begin to suffer some effects of altitude at above about 8000ft. However people who have always lived at these altitudes (or most sportsmen doing "high altitude training") will grow more oxygen carrying red blood cells when living at high altitude allowing them to function more normally. Some people from will not have the genes available to produce more red blood cells, and they will eventually become stressed and may die if they don't descend to levels where the atmosphere is more oxygen rich. They don't have the capability to adapt to lower oxygen levels.

"Normal" peoples red cell count will decline after a while at sea level, but people with genetic descent from high altitude tribes will retain elevated levels of red blood cells at sea level. There high red blood cell count is genetic and they won't grow less cells even at sea level. At high altitude over generations natural selection had winnowed out all those who don't have this capacity, they were less genetically "fit". If you wonder why all the successful long distance runners in the Olympics are Kenyan or Ethiopian (step forward Haile Gebrselassie), or Himalayan porters are Sherpas, it is because they come from people who live, and have lived for 100's of generations, at 9000ft.

You might wonder why everybody doesn't have more red blood cells in their blood if it offers advantages at altitude, the answer is there is a down-side at sea level, more red blood cells makes your blood "thicker" and raises the risk of thrombosis, strokes etc.

There is also an absolute limit to the height where humans can live, quote from Wikipedia "Finally, the death zone, in mountaineering, refers to altitudes above a certain point where the amount of oxygen cannot sustain human life. The point is generally tagged as 8,000 m (26,000 ft) [less than 356 millibars of atmospheric pressure]. Many deaths in high-altitude mountaineering have been caused by the effects of the death zone, either directly (loss of vital functions) or indirectly (wrong decisions made under stress, physical weakening leading to accidents). In the "death zone", no human body can acclimatize. The body uses up its store of oxygen faster than it can be replenished. An extended stay in the zone without supplementary oxygen will result in deterioration of body functions, loss of consciousness, and ultimately, death"

Go on you saying why is this relevant to fish? It is exactly the same process, a fish that has evolved in stable conditions usually has next to no genetic variability, it can't adapt to anything. It is maximally genetically fit in the "extreme" conditions of a black-water river or Lake Tanganyika, and totally unfit for life anywhere else.

You can keep common Bristlenoses or Cardinal Tetras in "unsuitable" water because there was some genetic variation to work with initially, and natural/artificial selection over generations has selected those fish that survive to breed in water with higher pH and carbonate buffering. If you got a wild Cardinal tetra, it will still be as difficult to keep as the first ones imported.

cheers Darrel
 

macvsog23

Pleco Profiles Team - RIP FRIEND
May 1, 2009
2,671
0
36
71
Bristol
Hi all,
I'll remember what Scatz said, so this really will be my last post on this thread. JoePlec wrote: That is exactly what we are saying, an individual fish doesn't, & can't, adapt outside of very limited parameters.

All living organisms have a range of conditions in which they can survive. I'll use humans and altitude/oxygen content as my example, as it is an example that every-one can relate to. Altitude sickness - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For most people they begin to suffer some effects of altitude at above about 8000ft. However people who have always lived at these altitudes (or most sportsmen doing "high altitude training") will grow more oxygen carrying red blood cells when living at high altitude allowing them to function more normally. Some people from will not have the genes available to produce more red blood cells, and they will eventually become stressed and may die if they don't descend to levels where the atmosphere is more oxygen rich. They don't have the capability to adapt to lower oxygen levels.

"Normal" peoples red cell count will decline after a while at sea level, but people with genetic descent from high altitude tribes will retain elevated levels of red blood cells at sea level. There high red blood cell count is genetic and they won't grow less cells even at sea level. At high altitude over generations natural selection had winnowed out all those who don't have this capacity, they were less genetically "fit". If you wonder why all the successful long distance runners in the Olympics are Kenyan or Ethiopian (step forward Haile Gebrselassie), or Himalayan porters are Sherpas, it is because they come from people who live, and have lived for 100's of generations, at 9000ft.

You might wonder why everybody doesn't have more red blood cells in their blood if it offers advantages at altitude, the answer is there is a down-side at sea level, more red blood cells makes your blood "thicker" and raises the risk of thrombosis, strokes etc.

There is also an absolute limit to the height where humans can live, quote from Wikipedia "Finally, the death zone, in mountaineering, refers to altitudes above a certain point where the amount of oxygen cannot sustain human life. The point is generally tagged as 8,000 m (26,000 ft) [less than 356 millibars of atmospheric pressure]. Many deaths in high-altitude mountaineering have been caused by the effects of the death zone, either directly (loss of vital functions) or indirectly (wrong decisions made under stress, physical weakening leading to accidents). In the "death zone", no human body can acclimatize. The body uses up its store of oxygen faster than it can be replenished. An extended stay in the zone without supplementary oxygen will result in deterioration of body functions, loss of consciousness, and ultimately, death"

Go on you saying why is this relevant to fish? It is exactly the same process, a fish that has evolved in stable conditions usually has next to no genetic variability, it can't adapt to anything. It is maximally genetically fit in the "extreme" conditions of a black-water river or Lake Tanganyika, and totally unfit for life anywhere else.

You can keep common Bristlenoses or Cardinal Tetras in "unsuitable" water because there was some genetic variation to work with initially, and natural/artificial selection over generations has selected those fish that survive to breed in water with higher pH and carbonate buffering. If you got a wild Cardinal tetra, it will still be as difficult to keep as the first ones imported.

cheers Darrel
A fantastic example of what I am saying this post adds to my knowlage and presents a interesting subject in a interesting way.
 

Warborg

Member
Oct 17, 2009
183
0
16
Austin,Texas
but thousands of people who keep bristlenose in malawi setups cant be wrong.
Funny, I remember someone insisted on keeping bristlenose with his malawi setup (this was on plecofantics) and it went on to many pages. I believe his final post was why was his bristlenose getting beat up?

I had a Texas Cichlid and a black shark that lived together for 3 years and out of the blue the Texas killed the Black shark...why? because it's their nature.

I bet thousands wonder why their bristlenose got beat up after years of being together. Or why their bristlenose seemly died of old age at 7 years of age instead of 15 or 20 years.

Why did one of my grandfathers live to be 92 but my other only lived to be 85? Could it be health and/or conditions he lived in?
 

macvsog23

Pleco Profiles Team - RIP FRIEND
May 1, 2009
2,671
0
36
71
Bristol
Funny, I remember someone insisted on keeping bristlenose with his malawi setup (this was on plecofantics) and it went on to many pages. I believe his final post was why was his bristlenose getting beat up?

I had a Texas Cichlid and a black shark that lived together for 3 years and out of the blue the Texas killed the Black shark...why? because it's their nature.

I bet thousands wonder why their bristlenose got beat up after years of being together. Or why their bristlenose seemly died of old age at 7 years of age instead of 15 or 20 years.

Why did one of my grandfathers live to be 92 but my other only lived to be 85? Could it be health and/or conditions he lived in?
Again an interesting point
I do remember the same post on PF I also remeber the same reasons being quoted for keeping them in with a malawi setup. Let us hope this poor fish will not meet the same fate despite the same reasons and answeres.

One point to be aware of only humans that killing as a crime, all other Sp have to kill as part of the Law.
In fact they treat not killing as the crime.
 

foti

Member
Apr 20, 2010
830
0
16
Sydney AUS 2206
i really wanted to read everyones post before i replied here but i couldn't :wb:

okay
1.cuckoo cats great for what you want bottom feeders and they wont hide!
2. Synodontus petricola same as cuckoo but smaller plus they dont need a host to breed

these guys are great for ph above 8!

you should also know that plecs wont keep algea down!

if you keep water ph at about 7.6 and kh at about 4 you should be able to keep mallawi cichlids and bn with out a problem

dont expect to see them much and you will get algea build up if you leave lights on and have no flow!

final thing you do what you want! im sure from the posts iv read it gives you both sides

why & why not!

so its up to you !

they wont die but that doesnt make it right
 

macvsog23

Pleco Profiles Team - RIP FRIEND
May 1, 2009
2,671
0
36
71
Bristol
Great post
Multi P is a natural cat for any mallawi or tanga tank
Only down side is if they spawn
I am sure the way they get the name will be the clue
Lots of dead fish to feed the baby cats
lets keep the post going as its getting more info in to people.

Regards bob